4.5c | Impact Evaluation

As a professional learning facilitator, the coach is expected to evaluate the impact of professional learning and continually make improvements in order to meet the schoolwide vision for using technology for high-impact teaching and learning.

In my post titled “A Model for Professional Learning Assessment“, I presented a comprehensive model for professional learning as well as a model for evaluating the professional learning. The two most common models for collecting information about the implementation process as well as the outcomes achieved are formative and summative evaluation. I also shared a five-step framework for evaluation which is iterative, dynamic, and mimics the continuous improvement process. The framework covers first defining the purpose of the evaluation, then planning the evaluation design and questions to be answered. This is followed by the implementation process by examining how data should be collected and analyzed. Next the results are interpreted and the information collected is used to inform the decision-making process.

In another post on “Tools for Engaging Online Learners with Experiential Learning“, I looked at experiential learning as a High Impact Educational Practice (HIP).  In this model, a time for reflective observation is key for the evaluation of learning effectiveness so that improvements can be made to the learning process.

As part of the Community Engagement Project for the Educational Technology Leadership module, I conducted a program evaluation for the newly-launched English Immersion Program in my school. Evaluation was conducted using Participatory Evaluation, Most Significant Change, and the Developmental Evaluation approach. After all data had been collected, I analyzed the data and came up with recommendations for program improvement.


< Previous: 4.5b Capacity Building | Next: 4.6a Data Collection >

< Back to Portfolio Home
< Back to 4.5 Professional Learning Facilitator

Related Posts

  • Developing an Employee Satisfaction Survey

    Developing an Employee Satisfaction Survey

    Introduction Carrying out Employee Satisfaction Surveys has many benefits including the ability to measure the level of engagement and satisfaction of staff, to identify areas of strengths and best practices, as well as potential risks and opportunities for improvement, and to provide input for managers for performance improvement. Besides, the survey can also serve to inform organizations of training and development as well as career development needs of staff. When carried out consistently, results from Employee Satisfaction Surveys can serve as a benchmark for future progress tracking. Survey Design Questionnaire Design Framework In developing the survey questionnaire, reference can be made to Labaw’s Framework for Questionnaire Design (Labaw (1980) as cited in Gendall (1998)). Labaw’s framework is divided into three main layers relating to question design, question wording, and formatting or layout. All three layers should be looked at and considered holistically during the survey design process. The general principles presented by Labaw (1980) states that survey design is very much driven by the respondent’s orientation and defines the type of questions we can ask, words we can use, concepts we can explore, and the methodology we can use. It is important to craft questions by considering what the respondents can

    Continue readingDeveloping an Employee Satisfaction Survey

  • Program Evaluation

    Program Evaluation

    Program evaluation for an English Immersion Program to review the marketability and program effectiveness …

    Continue readingProgram Evaluation

  • A Model for Professional Learning Assessment

    A Model for Professional Learning Assessment

    Exploring the distinction between professional development and professional learning and presenting an evaluation model for assessing the impact of professional learning. …

    Continue readingA Model for Professional Learning Assessment